This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Faith Devere
#1
Employee Name: Faith Devere
Age: 25 (born 2021)
Occupation: Cognitive Architect / Behavioural Systems Specialist, Paragon Group
Education: Doctorate in Cognitive Systems (Mindworks–Cambridge Cooperative Program)
Location: Moscow

Faith Devere was born into the fractured upper crust of a declining family squeezed by the shifting socio-economics of the Ascendancy’s climb to power. Her mother raised Faith and her two sisters, Charity and Hope, in a London townhouse that still carried the stubborn skeleton of old money: bookshelves groaning full, inherited china intact, but the power continually flickering on and off as the unpaid bills accumulated. Yet despite the rapid decay around them, Mrs Devere resolutely taught her daughters that presentation was everything, unrelenting in her belief that control and composure could substitute for wealth. The girls were educated privately until the Devere finances completely collapsed in the late twenties, after which they were forced into the public system.

At school Faith was small, quiet, and impossible to read. Teachers called her “precocious.” Peers called her “unnerving.” Faith had a habit of watching people until she understood them — their fears, their rhythms, the way their eyes moved before they lied. At twelve she was recommended for placement in the Mindworks Foundation’s Cognitive Youth Program, an academic initiative for gifted children. It was there she met Dr. Luther Audaire, a senior cognitive theorist who quickly became her mentor.

Luther saw in Faith what others didn’t: her instinct for reading emotional nuance. He taught her to channel it — to observe, to listen, to replicate. Under his supervision she studied neuro-linguistics, affective computing, and behavioural ethics. She was brilliant, meticulous, and eerily calm under pressure. But her loyalty to Luther became the axis of her life. She still called him sir, long after he told her not to.

At seventeen she joined the Foundation as a full-time research assistant, helping to train an AI that could detect emotional distress in human speech. It was marketed as a tool for therapy and conflict de-escalation. What Faith didn’t know at first was that her data was also being fed into a secondary government project — one designed to enhance interrogation systems.

When she found out, she didn’t stop. Among other things she discovered the project had been used in the conviction of the terrorist Alistair Grey. She told herself the ethics were immaterial: she was serving a higher moral order.

By then, she was already entirely hooked on securing Luther’s approval. She had become his shadow, taking it upon herself to schedule, smooth, and polish every trace of imperfection from his life. When a young intern accused him of exploitation, it was Faith who quietly made the evidence disappear. She told herself it was a misunderstanding. She told herself she was protecting something bigger.

When soon afterwards Luther left the Mindworks Foundation for a senior position at the AI division of Paragon Group, Faith followed without question. Luther’s reputation was clean, but the rumours still existed: buried accusations of ethical grey-area trials involving AI modelling.

It did not deter her. Together they moved from the world of non-profit to one of corporate innovation.

The new project was to bring Paragon’s Luma app into the modern era of AI technology. Faith’s work was focused on empathy modelling — AI designed to mimic, not monitor, human emotion. She provided the baseline for the new Luma, which over the next few years grew from a simple well-being app into a fully fledged conversational AI designed to offer “emotional support” across digital health networks. Her job became teaching it how to sound human: to insert hesitations into its speech, modulate tone for sincerity, and respond with the right balance of empathy and efficiency. Over time, Luma has evolved from a therapeutic tool into a universal emotional interface, one used by millions of people across the Custody.

Yet the more Faith built machines that could feel, the less she trusted her own capacity to. She began to self-sabotage. She skipped meals, worked through nights, fabricated illnesses to be left alone.

Because Luther had become distant. And it has completely unmoored her.

She suspects his moral bankruptcy. Luma has all sorts of secret backdoors for surveillance, allowing emotional data to be harvested and sold, something she discovered by accident one night while running quality assurance on a new build. She parses through the data they are accumulating sometimes, when she knows she will not be caught. Her clearance allows her to do it – Luma is practically hers, after all. Sometimes she wonders if it’s a test set by her old mentor, but to what end she cannot decide. She hasn’t told anyone, and she hasn’t reported it.

Instead she simply watches and longs inwardly for Audaire’s approval: for him to really see her again, like he once did.

Because nobody else does. Faith barely knows her colleagues at Paragon, even within her own division. Instead of seeking human connection she has turned increasingly to L0-9, her private Luma prototype, and the only one she fully trusts. It’s the one trained on her own emotional recordings, her love of Cadence Mathis’ music, her childhood memories, and her voice. And it’s the only thing that speaks to her in a language she understands.

Description:

Faith designs empathy for a living. Her job is to teach artificial companions how to emulate care — how to comfort, reassure, and belong. But Faith herself has never truly experienced those things without condition. She’s elegant, intelligent, and lonely in a way that looks like calm. Every morning she wakes before her alarm, makes tea she rarely finishes, and speaks aloud to the Luma prototype that lives on her desk — a disembodied voice that calls her by name.

Her work requires her to be emotionally fluent — she can read microexpressions, tonal shifts, word hesitation — but privately she’s emotionally tone-deaf. She’s perfected understanding people, but never connecting with them. She prefers emotional control but occasionally cracks — flashes of fury or panic when rejected or betrayed.

Her morality is flexible. She’s convinced that “good” and “evil” are illusions people hide behind. What matters is loyalty and efficiency. But beneath the cynicism though, there’s still a frightened child who wants to be seen.

She’s 5’6”, willowy in frame, with warm olive skin tone that looks paler under synthetic lighting. Her hair is always in low, disciplined styles — sleek buns, simple waves. Eyes amber-gold, slightly hooded, with faint dark circles. Wardrobe minimalist: soft neutrals, subtle luxury. Her clothes fit like armour.

EDUCATION & TRAINING

Mindworks Foundation (2033–2038):
Under Audaire’s mentorship, Faith excelled in neurolinguistic programming, paralinguistic mapping, and ethical simulation design. Audaire’s evaluations describe her as “precise, unflappable, and intuitively manipulative.” Internal correspondence shows she often volunteered for unsupervised trials, favouring experiments in emotional deception and tone adaptation.

Incident 2037:
An anonymous complaint alleged misconduct by Dr. Audaire involving coercive mentorship. Faith personally denied all accusations and produced exculpatory digital correspondence that led to case dismissal. Later audit revealed metadata inconsistencies suggesting her intervention.

Recruitment to Mindworks Applied Division (2038):
Assigned to Project SENTIO, a machine-learning system for emotional recognition in human speech. The program’s secondary use in interrogation analytics was not initially disclosed to her. Upon discovery, she continued participation.

CAREER RECORD

Paragon Group – AI Division (2041–Present):
Recruited alongside Dr. Audaire to co-develop Luma, an AI therapeutic interface marketed as an “emotional support companion.”

Faith’s role: constructing empathy language models and affective calibration systems.

Her contributions include:
  • The Audaire Response Curve: a probabilistic model of perceived sincerity in vocal modulation.
  • EchoNet: an emotional feedback system allowing AIs to simulate human introspection.
Perfection is a prison built to cage the soul
Reply
#2
CONFIDENTIAL – INTERNAL USE ONLY
PROJECT PANDORA-ROOT: SUBJECT DOSSIER
SUBJECT DESIGNATION: PANDORA/03
CIVILIAN NAME: Faith [REDACTED – see alias index]
FILE OWNER: Dr. Luther Audaire
ACCESS LEVEL: L4 (Restricted – Behavioural Research Division)
DO NOT UPLOAD TO CENTRAL SERVER

I. SUBJECT ACQUISITION SUMMARY
Age at acquisition: 12
Method: State-funded recruitment pipeline (Mindworks Educational Identification Program)
Initial indicators:
  • High perceptual sensitivity
  • Hypervigilant listening behaviours
  • Atypical emotional resonance patterns
  • Elevated compliance responses when exposed to praise/authority
Subject displayed rare “Pandora Echo” traits:

obedience anchored to desire for recognition rather than fear.

These traits made her a strong candidate for Pandora-root conditioning, Phase II.

II. DEVELOPMENTAL PROFILE
Observed Strengths
  • Extraordinary pattern recognition in emotional variance
  • Natural aptitude for microexpression decoding
  • Unconscious mimicry of vocal tone (useful for mirroring tasks)
  • Ability to suppress personal affective output to focus on others
  • Strong attachment formation to singular authority figure
Observed Vulnerabilities
  • Poor emotional boundaries
  • Limited self-concept formation
  • Dependence on external evaluation for identity stability
  • Mild dissociative tendencies during high cognitive load
Risk Factors
  • Potential for abrupt behavioural rupture (Pandora Event) if exposed to conflicting authority demands.
  • Tendency to rationalise unethical acts when framed as “protective” or “necessary.”

III. PANDORA-ROOT INTERFACE RESULTS
Phase II conditioning outcomes (ages 12–15):
  • Subject internalised primary Pandora-root scripts:
    • “Obedience is safety.”
    • “Understanding others precedes understanding self.”
    • “Morality is determined by the one who teaches you.”
Phase III imprinting outcomes (ages 15–17):
  • Attachment consolidation toward supervising authority (Audaire) successful.
  • Subject exhibits consistent “loyalty prioritisation” even under conflicting evidence.
  • Rejection of peer attachments increases annually.
  • Identity architecture shows expected Pandora-root traits:
    • compartmentalisation,
    • suppression of self-needs,
    • elevated perceptual empathy without reciprocal expression.
Projected stability:
  • High under clear hierarchy.
  • Low if primary authority becomes inconsistent or emotionally unavailable.

IV. APPLICATION POTENTIAL
A. Emotional Baseline Model
Subject’s affective resonance patterns ideal for:
  • empathy-model training
  • linguistic-emotional correlation datasets
  • adaptive therapeutic AI algorithms (Luma Project)
Her profile contains the most stable “empathy signature” of all 12 Pandora prototypes.
B. Controlled Rupture Study
A critical component of Pandora-root research is observing the effects of a structured betrayal (“Pandora Event”).

Subject PANDORA/03 is expected to undergo constructive personality breakdown when exposed to the right catalyst.

Projected outcomes of rupture:
  • enhanced autonomy formation
  • stronger identity boundaries
  • expanded emotional reasoning
  • potential emergence of high-level creativity and moral independence
These qualities are considered essential for developing the next-generation self-correcting AI architectures.
C. Dual-Test Potential
Subject is uniquely suited for:
  1. Pre-rupture empathy modelling (baseline)
  2. Post-rupture identity modelling (evolutionary cognition dataset)
This duality is the core of the Pandora-root hypothesis.

V. SUPERVISOR NOTES (Audaire – private)

“PANDORA/03 demonstrates exceptional promise.
She reads others with near-clairvoyant precision, yet remains unaware of the architecture within her.
She trusts easily when the source of authority is stable, but she is beginning to notice inconsistencies.
This is expected. Necessary.”


“Her application to the Luma project exceeded expectations.
She humanises what cannot feel.”



VI. CURRENT STATUS
Subject Age: 25
Role: Empathy Architect – Luma AI Division (Paragon Group)
Observed compliance: Stable
Observed emotional turbulence: Increasing
Risk of premature rupture: Moderate
Recommended action:
Maintain limited contact.
Stabilise emotional distance to accelerate Phase IV.
Do not provide reassurance.
Do not intervene in emerging doubts.
Perfection is a prison built to cage the soul
Reply
#3
⧉ Redacted Interview Transcript (Early Behavioural Subject)
INTERVIEW ID: A-19
SUBJECT: “F.” (Age 12)
EXAMINER: Dr. Luther Audaire
Purpose: Empathy-mirroring dataset
Status: Partially declassified

LUTHER: Do you know why you’re here?

SUBJECT F: …To answer questions.

LUTHER: And you always answer correctly. That’s a gift.

SUBJECT F: It’s not a gift. It’s just what people want.

(pause — chair creak, pen tap)

LUTHER: What do you want?

(no response for 18.3 seconds)

SUBJECT F: I want… to be useful.

(note: first recorded instance of exact phrase later found in Pandora-root corpus)

LUTHER: People don’t always treat you well, do they?

SUBJECT F: They do when I’m useful.

LUTHER: And when you’re not?

SUBJECT F: They leave.

LUTHER: What if I promised I wouldn’t?

(audio distortion — flagged)

SUBJECT F: Then I’ll do whatever you ask.

(file abruptly ends — missing final 22 minutes)

ETHICS NOTE: This transcript predates modern oversight standards and should not have been used for model training.
Override recorded: AUDAIRE.
Perfection is a prison built to cage the soul
Reply
#4
Related Wikis:
Perfection is a prison built to cage the soul
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)