Faith Devere

[Faith]

CONFIDENTIAL – INTERNAL USE ONLY
PROJECT PANDORA-ROOT: SUBJECT DOSSIER
SUBJECT DESIGNATION: PANDORA/03
CIVILIAN NAME: Faith [REDACTED – see alias index]
FILE OWNER: Dr. Luther Audaire
ACCESS LEVEL: L4 (Restricted – Behavioural Research Division)
DO NOT UPLOAD TO CENTRAL SERVER

---

I. SUBJECT ACQUISITION SUMMARY
Age at acquisition: 12
Method: State-funded recruitment pipeline (Mindworks Educational Identification Program)
Initial indicators:

• High perceptual sensitivity
  
• Hypervigilant listening behaviours
  
• Atypical emotional resonance patterns
  
• Elevated compliance responses when exposed to praise/authority
  

Subject displayed rare “Pandora Echo” traits:

obedience anchored to desire for recognition rather than fear.

These traits made her a strong candidate for Pandora-root conditioning, Phase II.

---

II. DEVELOPMENTAL PROFILE
Observed Strengths

• Extraordinary pattern recognition in emotional variance
  
• Natural aptitude for microexpression decoding
  
• Unconscious mimicry of vocal tone (useful for mirroring tasks)
  
• Ability to suppress personal affective output to focus on others
  
• Strong attachment formation to singular authority figure
  

Observed Vulnerabilities

• Poor emotional boundaries
  
• Limited self-concept formation
  
• Dependence on external evaluation for identity stability
  
• Mild dissociative tendencies during high cognitive load
  

Risk Factors

• Potential for abrupt behavioural rupture (Pandora Event) if exposed to conflicting authority demands.
  
• Tendency to rationalise unethical acts when framed as “protective” or “necessary.”
  

---

III. PANDORA-ROOT INTERFACE RESULTS
Phase II conditioning outcomes (ages 12–15):

• Subject internalised primary Pandora-root scripts:
  • “Obedience is safety.”
    
  • “Understanding others precedes understanding self.”
    
  • “Morality is determined by the one who teaches you.”
    

Phase III imprinting outcomes (ages 15–17):

• Attachment consolidation toward supervising authority (Audaire) successful.
  
• Subject exhibits consistent “loyalty prioritisation” even under conflicting evidence.
  
• Rejection of peer attachments increases annually.
  
• Identity architecture shows expected Pandora-root traits:
  • compartmentalisation,
    
  • suppression of self-needs,
    
  • elevated perceptual empathy without reciprocal expression.
    

Projected stability:

• High under clear hierarchy.
  
• Low if primary authority becomes inconsistent or emotionally unavailable.
  

---

IV. APPLICATION POTENTIAL
A. Emotional Baseline Model
Subject’s affective resonance patterns ideal for:

• empathy-model training
  
• linguistic-emotional correlation datasets
  
• adaptive therapeutic AI algorithms (Luma Project)
  

Her profile contains the most stable “empathy signature” of all 12 Pandora prototypes.
B. Controlled Rupture Study
A critical component of Pandora-root research is observing the effects of a structured betrayal (“Pandora Event”).

Subject PANDORA/03 is expected to undergo constructive personality breakdown when exposed to the right catalyst.

Projected outcomes of rupture:

• enhanced autonomy formation
  
• stronger identity boundaries
  
• expanded emotional reasoning
  
• potential emergence of high-level creativity and moral independence
  

These qualities are considered essential for developing the next-generation self-correcting AI architectures.
C. Dual-Test Potential
Subject is uniquely suited for:

1. Pre-rupture empathy modelling (baseline)
   
2. Post-rupture identity modelling (evolutionary cognition dataset)
   

This duality is the core of the Pandora-root hypothesis.

---

V. SUPERVISOR NOTES (Audaire – private)

“PANDORA/03 demonstrates exceptional promise.
She reads others with near-clairvoyant precision, yet remains unaware of the architecture within her.
She trusts easily when the source of authority is stable, but she is beginning to notice inconsistencies.
This is expected. Necessary.”

“Her application to the Luma project exceeded expectations.
She humanises what cannot feel.”

---

VI. CURRENT STATUS
Subject Age: 25
Role: Empathy Architect – Luma AI Division (Paragon Group)
Observed compliance: Stable
Observed emotional turbulence: Increasing
Risk of premature rupture: Moderate
Recommended action:
Maintain limited contact.
Stabilise emotional distance to accelerate Phase IV.
Do not provide reassurance.
Do not intervene in emerging doubts.